• Hinduism / Peganism vs. Abrahamism

Islamism, Christianims, Judaism


Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan: A person shall not be qualified for election as President unless he is a Muslim of not less than forty-five years of age and is qualified to be elected as member of the national assembly. इस्लामिक रिपब्लिक ऑफ पाकिस्तान का संविधान: एक व्यक्ति को राष्ट्रपति पद का चुनाव योग्य नहीं माना जाएगा, जब तक कि वह पैंतालीस साल से कम उम्र का मुसलमान न हो और उसे नेशनल असेंबली का सदस्य चुने जाने की योग्यता हो।

Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan: "non-Muslim" means a person who is not a Muslim and includes a person belonging to the Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist or Parsi community, a person of the Quadiani group or the Lahori group (who call themselves Ahmadis or by any other name) or a Bahai and person belonging to any of the scheduled castes. इस्लामिक रिपब्लिक ऑफ पाकिस्तान का संविधान: "नॉन-मुसलिम" का अर्थ है एक व्यक्ति जो मुस्लिम नहीं है और इसमें ईसाई, हिंदू, सिख, बौद्ध या पारसी समुदाय से संबंधित व्यक्ति, क़दियन समूह या लाहौरी समूह का व्यक्ति शामिल है (जो खुद को अहमदी कहते हैं या किसी अन्य द्वारा) नाम), या बहाई, और अनुसूचित जातियों में से किसी से संबंधित व्यक्ति।

In Afghanistan Islam is the official state religion, stated explicitly in the constitution: "The sacred religion of Islam is the religion of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan." The constitution also requires the president and vice president to belong to the state religion – as do some other countries – and other senior officials must swear allegiance to the principles of Islam in their oaths of office. Political parties’ charters must not run contrary to the principles of Islam, and the Ulema Council, a group of influential Islamic scholars, imams and jurists, meets regularly with government officials to advise on legislation. The constitution mandates that "No law shall contravene the tenets and provisions of the holy religion of Islam in Afghanistan".

"But between belief and actual character there is a wide difference. As a follower of Islam I am bound to regard the creed of Islam as superior to that professed by the followers of any non-Islamic religion. And in this sense the creed of even a fallen and degraded Mussalman is entitled to a higher place than that of any other non-Muslim irrespective of his high character even though the person in question be Mahatma Gandhi himself." — Mohammad Ali Jauhar Letter to Swami Shraddhananda, quoted in Arun Shourie - The World of Fatwas Or The Sharia in Action.

"To consider one’s creed as superior to that of every non-Muslim is the duty of a Mussalman." — Mohammad Ali Jauhar In a letter to the Tej, quoted in Arun Shourie - The World of Fatwas Or The Sharia in Action

Writing in 1921 in Comrade - Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar: "I am a Muslim first and every thing else afterwards; just as I believe that Mahatma Gandhi is Hindu first and everything else afterwards. All that Islam demands from me is that I should not live in a land where I could not follow the dictates of my religion with impunity and it is just because Swaraj (self-rule) will give me that and the present British autocracy does not that I yearn for Swaraj and regards its attainment as a religious duty.”

Mohammed Ali pleaded Muslims to send a separate delegation in 1930s London Round Table Conference to represent Muslims. His appeal symbolized the collapse of the old alliance on which Gandhi had built the non-cooperation movement and clearly showed that only Muslim League spoke for the Indian Muslims. Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar in 1930 during speech at the Round Table Conference: "Religion to my mind, means the interpretation of life. I have a culture, a polity, an outlook on life, a complete synthesis which is Islam. Where God commands, I am a Muslim first, a Muslim second, and a Muslim last, and nothing but a Muslim.... My first duty is to my Maker, not to His Majesty the King, nor to my companion Dr. Moonje."


Excerpts from Sahih Al-Bukhari

Sahih Al-Bukhari: 2478. Narrated 'Abdullãh bin Mas'ud: The Prophet entered Makkah and (at that time) there were three hundred and sixty idols around the Ka'bah. He started stabbing the idols with a stick he had in his hand and reciting: "And say Truth (i.e. Islamic Monotheism or this Qur'an or Jihad against polytheists) has come and Batil (falsehood i.e. Satan or polytheism) has vanished." (V.17:81)

साहिह अल-बुखारी: 2478 - अब्दुल्लाह बिन मसूद ने वर्णन किया: पैगंबर ने मक्का में प्रवेश किया और (उस समय) काबा के चारों ओर तीन सौ और साठ मूर्तियाँ थीं। उसने मूर्तियों को अपने हाथ में रखी एक छड़ी से मारना शुरू कर दिया और पढ़ते हुए कहा: "और सच कहो (यानी इस्लामिक एकेश्वरवाद या यह कुरान या जिहाद बहुदेववादियों के खिलाफ) आया है और बातिल (झूठ, यानी शैतान या बहुदेववाद) गायब हो गया है।"

Muhammd Breaking Idols


Communism

कम्युनिस्ट और इस्लाम का गठबंधन केवल भारत में है...जबकि एक भी कम्युनिस्ट देश ऐसा नहीं है जहाँ इस्लाम को छूट हो....और एक भी इस्लामिक राष्ट्र ऐसा नहीं जहाँ पर कम्युनिस्टों पर प्रतिबंध ना लगा हो!

July 2005 London Tube bombings, terrorist attacks on Bali and Sri Lanka (Ester terror strikes at Colombo Church), 13 February 2010 – a bomb explosion at the German Bakery in Pune, In July 2013 - nine bombs exploded in a terror attack at the Bodh Gaya temple complex, 2005 Delhi bombings - Three explosions went off in the Indian capital of New Delhi on 29 October 2005 which killed more than 60 people and injured at least 200 others. It was followed by 5 bomb blasts on 13 September 2008. On 7 December 2010 - another blast occurred in Varanasi that killed immediately a toddler and set off a stampede in which 20 people were injured. The responsibility for the attack was claimed by the Islamist militant group Indian Mujahideen. 25 August 2007 Hyderabad bombings, Terror attacks in Mumbai, November 26-29, 2008. The terrorist attack on the train to Pakistan had killed 68 people mostly Pakistanis near Panipat on February 18 2007 but some remember attack on a Masjid in NewZealand (Christchurch shooting).


Islamic Contradictions

Islam is the official religion in 27 countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa as well North Africa and the Middle East. Thirteen countries – including nine in Europe – are officially Christian, two (Bhutan and Cambodia) have Buddhism as their state religion, and one (Israel) is officially a Jewish state. No country has Hinduism as its state religion. And the Izlamists want a secular India!

Whatever may have been necessary or permissible during the Prophet’s lifetime…(That) …cannot be defended on the mere ground of its mention in the Koran. Every formula of every religion has in this age of reason, to submit to the acid test of reason and universal justice if it is to ask for universal assent. Error can claim no exemption even if it can be supported by the scriptures of the world. (Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Vol. 30, p. 312)

Gandhi noted: "All religions are more or less true. All proceed from the same God, but all are imperfect because they have come down to us through imperfect human instrumentality." - (Young India, 29 May 1924, p. 180). In an article published in 1924, Gandhi asserts: "My own experience confirms the opinion that the Mussalman as a rule is a bully."

Check details of Haji Yaqoob Qureshi (biggest meat supplier in Meerut, slaughter houses at Hapur road) who announced a reward of Rs 51 crore for anybody who would kill the cartoonist of the Danish newspaper Jyllands Posten in 2006. In 2015, he invited the Charlie Hebdo killers to collect the reward from him in cash. Both SP and BSP coddled him.

What random ranting is this! Lets look at your country, Kuwait. It does not offer citizenship to ANY Indian before 20 years of stay. After 20 years, ONLY citizens practicing Islam can apply for citizenship. Is this the humanity and respect, you are preaching us Indians about?

  • Perpetual whining and victim card. That is not real Islam - facinating objection. Islam makes a very large claim - the last and final religion and/or revelation.. Islam is the 'only' solution of everything -- sexuality, finance, diet, banking, after-life and in a bizarre hypocrisy, Islam does not like these claims to be questioned. Idea of perfect human being and idea of perfect book - each and every word (not even written down but receited) - a very questionable concept. Islam is the equivalent of the Third Reich for muslims. Religion is a personal choice but the muslim faith is a totalitarian ideology that seeks to dominate and proliferate into every part of society. There may be moderate muslims but their is no moderate islam.
  • Hindus and non-Muslims, even Shias, in Kuwait aren’t allowed public display of their faith or celebrate their festivals in public. There is ban on sale/available of non-Muslim religious literature in books shops. Kuwait prohibits and censors mention of Holocaust of Jews.

    Saying Kashmir is an integral part of India is islamophobia now? Just clarifying. Always good to know the random changes to the definition of that made up word. Thumb rule : Hindus refusing to roll over and die is Islamophobia. This is applicable for Jews as well. That we exist is Islamophobia.

    When these Islamists accuse us Ex-Muslims of having left Islam for white women, they are actually expressing their own desires. With their inferiority complex, they always fantasize about sex with white women, but then they end up unwillingly marrying their own cousins instead.

    There is no such thing as moderate Muslims! All of them, they either accept it silently or loudly. India must not give in to their demands and must stop all Muslims immigrants immediately from coming in to the country! One of the precepts of Islam is that every man must strive to Islamify the host country. To that extent at least there is no such thing as a moderate. They come not to integrate but eventually, as they are required to do to subjugate. As usual, liberal radicals always avoid the main questions.

    Libertarded soul - trying to appear as someone "intolerant of intolerance". Wahabism and where it has taken the islamic community. Japans prospects for victory were non existant but it would have cost over a million lives to stop them with hand to hand combat....they too had suicidal kamikaze mentality just like Islam encourages their people to adopt. History tells us religions will aways and have always protected there interest and values in many cases with violence. The only problem with Islamic fundamentalism is the fundamentals of Islam.

    Muslims make such a fuss about Christians being polytheists since they believe Jesus to be God and the son of God, but pointing out that practices and rituals like venerating the Kaaba amounts to idol worship and they'll want to hear nothing of it.

    If you are unable to carry honour, put it in women's hymen. If you feel horny seeing a woman, put a burqa on them. If you can't stay loyal to a woman, marry four.

    Most religions have their crazy ideas, many religions had their barbaric past.. Islam is the only one where people take the crazy serious enough to blow themselves up in the name of their god. The problem is Islam is doing it now, in the 21st century. No one is talking about some horrible violence done in the name of god hundreds of years ago, it is about today.

    There are 57 countries with Muslim majority. Please name few of them which are role model for the rest of the world. मुस्लिम बाहुल्य वाले 57 देश हैं। कृपया उनमें से कुछ का नाम लें जो बाकी दुनिया के लिए रोल मॉडल हैं। We all know only muslims are fighting for survival in Ziniang, Afganistan, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Palestine, Nigeria...

    They talks about bigotry towards Muslims, but in reality it is actually the Muslims who practice bigotry against anyone who is not muslim, that is why they segregate themselves so they can be set apart from the infidels. There would not be people afraid of Muslims if they werent destroying countries, enslaving women and children and doing lone wolf attacks around the world, but of course we know they cant and wont stop doing this because its what they are called to do according to Quranic teachings.

    Religious liberty is not unlimited. China’s treatment of Uighurs may seem harsh but if the alternative is the rise of radical Islam that will tear the country apart, there is nothing wrong in it even if it is immoral. Similarly, while Muslims may be persecuted in India, the treatment of Christians and Hindus in Pakistan and its despicable anti-blasphemy laws make it at least understandable why a secular country such as India may feel threatened by Islam. A more nuanced approach to religious liberty is required if we have to combat the rise of religious terrorism.

    Caste System in Religions

    4.34: Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, as Allah has given some of them an advantage over others, and because they spend out of their wealth. The good women are obedient, guarding what Allah would have them guard. As for those from whom you fear disloyalty, admonish them, and abandon them in their beds, then strike them. But if they obey you, seek no way against them. Allah is Sublime, Great.

    9:29 - MAFIA verse: PAY OR DIE! Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. The word "FIGHT" is in the Arabic quran "QATILOO" and this means "FIGHT TO KILL".

    A country which hangs apostates, hangs converts and homosexuals. A country which stones adulterers. Amputates hands for petty thefts. Flogs alcoholics. A country which has eliminated its entire native Zoroastrian population is talking about minority rights!

    Language of Islam is dualistic. There is never any reference to humanity as a unified whole. There is a division into believer and kafir. Humanity is not seen as one body, but is divided into whether the person believes Mohammed is prophet of Allah or not.

    3:28 Believers should not take kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah’s protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him.

    #Quran: 3-85 Whoever seeks other than #Islam as a religion, it will not be accepted from him, and in the Hereafter he will be among the losers. जो कोई भी इस्लाम के अलावा एक अन्य धर्म को पसंद करता है, उसे उससे स्वीकार नहीं किया जाएगा, और इसके बाद वह हारे हुए लोगों में से एक होगा।

    9:29 Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya], and they are humiliated.

    33:60 They [kafirs] will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and murdered. It was Allah’s same practice with those who came before them, and you will find no change in Allah’s ways.

    Pretty much there is not much of difference between Judaism, Islam and Christianity. They all include some sort of insanity. The bigest problem with islam would be still accepting the Quran litterally word by word. Degree of insanity they would like to ignore will be highly depend upon human development level of their society. Therefore, an avarage muslim in Pakistan would have much different standards than that of in Germany.

    Ahmadi muslim and Bahai muslim abhor Wahabi, Deobandi and other sects. But they believe in massacre of infidels on kayamat (sort of judgement day). It just could be something like "whatever floats your boat". Go to any Islamic country stand up and announce you are an atheist or a gay person or just question any aspect of Islam...........you will find out quickly how peaceful the religion is. किसी भी इस्लामिक देश में जाकर खड़े हो जाओ और घोषणा करो कि तुम नास्तिक हो, या समलैंगिक व्यक्ति हो, या बस इस्लाम के किसी भी पहलू पर सवाल उठाते हो ... आपको जल्दी ही पता चल जायेगा कि धर्म कितना शांतिपूर्ण है।

    The Islamic State isn't misrepresenting Islam but representing its purest form. The core of Islam is Allah, the perfect creator. Thus, there should be no reason to circumcise children. The core of Islam is global submission by any means necessary. इस्लामिक स्टेट इस्लाम को गलत तरीके से पेश नहीं कर रहा है बल्कि उसके शुद्धतम रूप का प्रतिनिधित्व कर रहा है। इस्लाम का मूल अल्लाह, सब से बढ़िया निपुण रचनाकार है। इस प्रकार, बच्चों का खतना करने का कोई कारण नहीं होना चाहिए। इस्लाम का मूल आवश्यक किसी भी तरह से वैश्विक प्रबलता है।

    Their newest weapon is sympathy - they claim that they are being targeted in non-Muslim countries. If God "Allah" wants all humanity to follow Islam then why he didn't send many Mohammads to Europe, Rome, Greek, Mongolia, China and Persia.....Wouldn't it be easier than a long way Caliphate? Aren't Buddhists supposed to be pacifists and detach themselves from worldly matters like politics? Good to know that it isn't just the Abrahamic faiths that are full of hypocrites. Islam is terrified of its critics, because they know they literally have no way to defend their nonsense cult. In fact, Islam died in debate years ago.

    We are all terrified that the religion of "peace and brotherhood" will spread and destroy us with its message of love and peace and harmonious living, haha!. Islam is built on the four pillars, fear, terror, lies and conquest. However the only pillar still standing is that of lies and only because of plenty help from western socialists. Terrorizing people who burn the quran is supposed to bolster islam by creating fear of islam but in the modern age of book printing the effect is more comical and makes islam appear primitive, out of touch with modern technology.

    Go and try talking to a failed suicide bombers - who was on the path to the Prophet. Was it a miracle or did he made a mistake? Ever noticed how the media is sympathetic towards the muslims? People who like organized religion and religious hatred by using concepts of Kaphirs and non-believers and have no intellectual power to question should join Islam. जाओ और एक असफल आत्मघाती हमलावर से बात करने की कोशिश करो - जो पैगंबर के रास्ते पर था। क्या यह चमत्कार था या उसने कोई गलती की थी? कभी गौर किया है कि मीडिया कैसे मुसलमानों के प्रति सहानुभूति रखता है? वे लोग जो काफ़िरों और गैर-विश्वासियों की अवधारणाओं का उपयोग करके संगठित धर्म और धार्मिक घृणा को पसंद करते हैं और जिनके पास सवाल करने की कोई बौद्धिक शक्ति नहीं है, वे इस्लाम में शामिल हो सकते हैं।

    Libertarded soul - trying to appear as someone "intolerant of intolerance". Japans prospects for victory were non existant but it would have cost over a million lives to stop them with hand to hand combat...they too had suicidal kamikaze mentality just like Islam encourages their people to adopt. History tells us religions will aways and have always protected there interest and values in many cases with violence. The only problem with Islamic fundamentalism is the fundamentals of Islam.

    Every day some imam rants about the need for Muslims to kill Christians, Jews, Hindus, atheists, gays and everyone not Islamic and no one says a word. But let just one person commit any act showing displeasure with Islam and they call for Armageddon. हर दिन कुछ इमाम मुसलमानों को ईसाईयों, यहूदियों, हिंदुओं, नास्तिकों, समलैंगिकों को मारने की आवश्यकता के बारे में बताते हैं और हर कोई इस्लामिक नहीं है और कोई भी एक शब्द नहीं कहता है। लेकिन सिर्फ एक व्यक्ति को इस्लाम के प्रति नाराजगी दिखाने वाले किसी भी कार्य को करने दें और वे नरसंहार की बात करने लगेंगे.

    Every major religion in this world will collapse if people ask logical questions. People are expected to adhere to religious tenets only on the basis of blind faith. So, whichever religion allows the human intellect to blossom and satisfy itself through logical conclusions will only flourish in future. इस दुनिया में हर बड़ा धर्म ध्वस्त हो जाएगा अगर लोग तार्किक सवाल पूछें। लोगों से यह अपेक्षा की जाती है कि वे अंध विश्वास के आधार पर केवल धार्मिक सिद्धांतों का पालन करें। इसलिए, जो भी धर्म मानव बुद्धि को तार्किक निष्कर्ष के माध्यम से खिलने और संतुष्ट करने की अनुमति देता है, वह भविष्य में ही फलता-फूलता रहेगा।

    Read the Hadiths and it will explain all there is about Sharia...its being able to marry four women, its being able to have FGM performed on your daughter, its about owning slaves, its about dogs being haram and chasing Muslim angels away. Its about death for leaving Islam or for criticizing the prophet, its about how hard it is for a woman to get a divorce....and if she does he keeps the kids, its about women walking behind the man and not being able to pray with her own husband but stay in the back....its about women being covered up like a black baggie in summer while the man looks cool in his Izod shirt and shorts and sandels...like any western guy while his wife is made fun of...Its about announcing to the world that a little girl has her period and putting her in a hijab ....Not in the West but in other countries its a signal she is ready for marriage................on and on.

    The peace in Islam is submission, oppression and jizyah (when in the majority) but a lesser jihad when in the minority. Islam’s peace everyone else’s enslavement. The P in Islam stands for peace. Talk to any muslim and all of them shall say "prove me wrong and educate yourself". Muslims should get education because they limit their life with a book that teaches you to beat your women and enslave them or kill the unbelievers so you can have 72 virgins in heaven!

    Being destitute doesn’t cause terrorism of the Islamic variety. It’s been passed on through centuries and it is encouraged in madrassas, Islamic schools and mosques the world over. These terrorist groups and fundamentalist Muslim groups that have grown now even in Western countries all say they want to establish a sharia ruled state (which is why the Muslim Brotherhood was overthrown as they would have changed Egypt’s culture.) This is a threat to every secular government country. Islam’s morally depraved teachings has given them a warped sense of morality. For a book they’ll riot or kill, but if a muslim blows up some kids at a concert, for example, they can’t be bothered. Muslims lay bare their stupidity with an uncurbed enthusiasm for a demented god and duplicitous warlord of the murderous kind. It’s a kind of moral retardation in my opinion and one that is very difficult to reason with.

    It is easy to blame other countries, but one can’t blame other countries for a religious ideology that has been a problem for centuries and is not the making of Western powers. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, for three, pour millions of dollars into spreading Islam and jihad which is commanded by Islam. अन्य देशों को दोष देना आसान है, लेकिन आप एक धार्मिक विचारधारा के लिए अन्य देशों को दोष नहीं दे सकते हैं जो सदियों से एक समस्या है और पश्चिमी शक्तियों का निर्माण नहीं है। सऊदी अरब, कतर, तुर्की, तीनों के लिए, इस्लाम और जिहाद फैलाने में लाखों डॉलर खर्च करते हैं जिसकी कमान इस्लाम के पास है।

    मक्का जितने पर मोहम्मद ने किसी का भी कत्ल ना करने का वादा किया लेकिन मोहम्मद ने उन तमाम लोगों को खत्म कर दिया जिन्होंने उसे अल्लाह का रसूल नहीं माना था... जिन्होंने कुरान के जैसे ही सुरा, आयतें और कुरान जैसी किताब बनाकर मोहम्मद की चुनौती को पूरा किया था.. उसमे से कुछ नाम है - काम बिन अशरफ, मोहम्मद बिन सलमा....मक्का की एक कवियित्री थी अस्मा बिन्त मरवान, जिसने मोहम्मद के मक्का जितने के बाद मोहम्मद के विरोध मे कविताओं से लोगों को जागृत करने का प्रयास किया..मोहम्मद की निर्दयता का इससे बड़ा प्रमाण नहीं हो सकता है कि उसने अस्मा बिन्त मरवान का कत्ल उस समय करवाया जब वो अपने नवजात बच्चे को दूध पिला रहीं थीं....उम्म कीरफा - ये बुजुर्ग महिला थी जो कि बनू फाजरा कबीले की सरदार थी, इनके कबीले पर हमला करके इनको बंदी बना लिया गया और उम्म किरफा की दोनों टाँगों को दो ऊंटों से बाँध कर उन ऊंटों को विपरित चलाकर उसके शरीर के दो हिस्से कर दिए गए....

    अल्लाह और कुरान के होने का आधार सिर्फ मोहम्मद है क्योकि मोहम्मद ने ये सब होने का दावा किया था ! अल्लाह के नाम पर चालाकी से मुहम्मद खुद की पूजा करवाना चाहता था, इसलिये उसने एक मंत्र भी बनाया, जिसमे अल्लाह के साथ उसका भी नाम लिया जाये! उस मंत्र को कलिमा कहते हैं. मंत्र है, "ला इलाहलिल्लाहू मुहम्मद्दुर रसुल्ल्लाहू". इस अरबी वाक्य का अक्षरशः अर्थ है, “केवल अल्लाह की पूजा हो सकती है. मुहम्मद अल्लाह का रसूल है|” अगर कोई काफ़िर कलिमा को अपने ईष्टदेव की निंदा कहे और पंथनिरपेक्ष पूजा न माने, तो उसे भारतीय दंड संहिता की धाराओं १५३ व २९५ के अधीन - दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता की धारा १९६ के अंतर्गत राष्ट्रपति और राज्यपाल जेल भेजवाने के लिए विवश हैं. कोई जज कुरान के विरुद्ध सुनवाई नहीं कर सकता. (एआईआर, कलकत्ता, १९८५, प१०४).

    • सवाल: मौहम्मद ही सच मे अरबी अल्लाह का दूत है, इसका क्या सबूत है? मुस्लिम: क्योकि कुरान मे लिखा है !
    • सवाल: कुरान के लिखे पर कैसे विश्वास किया जाए की ये क्या कहती है, क्या नही ?
    • मुस्लिम: क्योकि हमारे अल्लाह ने कुरान को भेजा है!
    • सवाल: क्या सबूत है अल्लाह ही सचमुच ईश्वर है और कुरान की बाते अल्लाह का पैगाम है?
    • मुस्लिम: क्योकि हमारे रसूल मौहम्मद ने ऐसा कहा है! अब यहा फिर शुरू से पहला सवाल पूछना पडेगा और आखिरी सवाल पर आखिरी सवाल पर आना पड़ेगा ये तो कुछ ऐसे हुआ जैसे कि "मै खुदा हू और इसका सबूत ये है कि मै कह रहा हूँ ."
    क्योकि मुहम्मद अरब का था तो उसने अरबी अल्लाह ,अरबी फरिश्ते, कुरान अरबी मे, नबी अरब के, हज अरब मे और अरबी इबादती तरीको को मिलाकर अरबी साम्राज्यवाद को इस्लाम का नाम दे दिया! इस तरह वो अपनी करतूतो को धर्म का जामा पहिना कर उसे जायज बना देता था, और अपनी बेतुकी बातों को अल्लाह का आदेश बता देता था और लालची, अज्ञानी अरब उसे मान लेते थे ! आज मुस्लिम अपने अरबी मजहब की चमकदार मार्केटिंग करने के लिए और शरियत का माहौल तैयार करने के लिए जी जान से जुटे रहते है ! लेकिन अंदर से इन्हे अपने मजहबी झूठ के पर्दाफाश हो जाने का भय सताता रहता है और इस झूठ के बोझ को संभालने के लिए मुसलमान कैसे रात दिन एक कर देते है, एक आनलाइन डिबेट मे इसका नमूना देखिए :
    1. बसे पहले मुस्लिम बोलते है कि ये सब तथ्यहीन आधारहीन है, अज्ञानता है, इस्लाम मे कोई जबरदस्ती नही है! अगर आप रैफरेंस देंगे वो सिरे से नकार देंगे और आपको पूरी तरह कुरान स्टड़ी करने को बोला जायेगा तभी रोशनी मिलेगी !
    2. अगर आप कुरान और हदीसो के हवाले देंगे तो आपको बोलेगे कि तुमने आयते अधूरी समझी है, आयतो को गलत संदर्भ मे लिया है और उन आयतो मे लडाई का मतलब उस समय के युद्ध से था (यानि इससे मुस्लिम यह दिखाना चाहते है कि अब हम दुनियाभर मे जेहाद नही कर रहे है)
    3. अगर आप संपूर्ण आयतो और हदीसो का हवाला देंगे तो वो कहेंगे आपका अनुवाद गलत है और आपको अरबी सीखने के साथ आरिजनल वर्जन पढ़ने को बोला जायेगा!
    4. अगर आप कहेंगे कि आप अरबी भी जानते है साथ ही आपके पास प्रमाणित अनुवाद और सारी जानकारी उन्ही प्रमाणित रिसोर्स से है जिससे सर्वश्रेष्ठ मुस्लिम स्कालर्स हवाला देते है, तो मुसलमान कहेंगे कि हदीसे पढ़ना भी जरूरी है ... अगर आप हदीस से सच साबित करेंगे तो वे कहेंगे कुरान ही एकमात्र सच है!
    5. इन सबके बाद अगर आप जारी रखते है तो वे इस मुद्दे से बात घुमाने के लिये दूसरे टापिक उठायेंगे जैसे गरीबी, इंसानियत, शांति, फिलिस्तीन, इजराइल, अमेरिका वगैरह वगैरह !
    6. अगर आप कहेंगे कि कुरान इंसान ने लिखी है तो वे Dr Maurice Bucalie की किताब का हवाला देकर सुनिश्चित करेंगे कि कुरान मे विज्ञान भी है ! जबकि असल मे Dr. Bucalie सऊदी अरब से पैसे लिया करता था और Dr. Bucalie को कई विशेषज्ञो ने गलत और झूठा साबित कर दिया है !
    7. अब फिर मुस्लिम बोलेंगे कि ये सब वैस्टर्न मीड़िया का प्रौपगेंड़ा है इस्लाम को बदनाम करने का !
    8. अगर आप फिर भी सच सामने लायेंगे तो वे दूसरे मजहबो मे की किताबो मे कमियां निकालेंगे जैसे बाइबल, तोराह, वेद, गीता, आदि !
    9. लेकिन हद तो यहा है कि जिन किताबो को ये नही मानते उन्ही किताबो मे ये अपने मोहम्मद जी को अवतार भी दिखायेंगे ... और इस्लाम को जबरदस्ती विज्ञान से जोड़गे! (मतलब किसी भी तरह से हर हाल मे इस्लाम और मौहम्मद जी की मार्केटिंग करते रहते है ! इस तरह ये हमेशा काफिरो को थकाकर और उलझा कर रखते है !)
    10. अगर आप न रूके तो मुसलमान द्वारा आपको जाहिल झुठा, कुत्ता, जालिम वगैरह के साथ मां बहन की गाली और निजी हमले किये जायेंगे |
    11. अब ये रट्टा लगायेंगे कि "इस्लाम तेजी से फैल रहा है" लेकिन जैसे ही सच्चाई सामने लायी जाये तो ये चिल्ला भी पड़ेंगे इस्लाम खतरे में है !
    12. अगर फिर भी आप असली मुद्दे पर अड़े रहेंगे तो मुसलमान बोलेंगे तुम जहुन्नम मे जाओगे ...आखिरी दिन तुम्हारा हिसाब होगा ...तुम पर अल्लाह का आजाब होगा ..अल्लाह तुम्हारे साथ ये कर देगा.. वो कर देगा, वगैरह वगैरह!
    13. और आखिर में जब सब फेल हो जायेगा तो अब मुसलमान धमकाने पर आ जायेंगे जैसे तुम्हे देख लूंगा, बचके रहना, अपना नंबर और एड्रेस बताओ !
    14. और आखिर में डरकर बंदा चुप हो जायेगा तो ये ढोल पीटेंगे और कहेंगे कि हमने डिबेट जीत ली है, इस्लाम जीत गया है ...इस्लाम जिंदाबाद! इसलिए मुसलमान ऊपर से जैसे भी हो पर उनके दिलोदिमाग में,नसो में इस्लाम गूंजता रहता है!

    Official written copy by Uthman The Quran was originally revealed in Quraishi dialect of Arabic. But to facilitate the people who speak other dialects, in their understanding and comprehension, Allah revealed the Quran finally in seven dialects of Arabic. During the period of Caliph Uthman (third successor to the Prophet) differences in reading the Quran among the various tribes became obvious, due to the various dialectical recitations. Dispute was arising, with each tribe calling its recitation as the correct one. This alarmed Uthman, who made an official copy in the Quraishi dialect, the dialect in which the Quran was revealed to the Prophet and was memorized by his companions. Thus this compilation by Uthman's Committee is not a different version of the Quran (like the Biblical versions) but the same original revelation given to the Prophet by One God, Allah.

    Narrated Anas bin Malik: Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham (Syria) and the people of Iraq were waging war to conquer Armenia and Azherbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their differences in the recitation of the Quran, so he said to Uthman, 'O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and Christians did before'. So Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, 'Send us the manuscripts of the Quran so that we may compile the Quranic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you'. Hafsa sent it to Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin Az-Zubair, Said bin Al-As and Abdur Rahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, 'In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Quran, then write it in their (Quraishi) tongue'. They did so, and when they had written many copies, Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied and ordered that all the other Quranic materials whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt…"

    Again a very stringent criteria was set up by this Committee to prevent any alteration of the Revelation.
    1. The earlier recension (Original copy prepared by Abu Bakr) was to serve as the principal basis of the new one.
    2. Any doubt that might be raised as to the phrasing of a particular passage in the written text was to be dispelled by summoning persons known to have learned the passage in question from the Prophet.
    3. Uthman himself was to supervise the work of the Council.
    When the final recension was completed, Uthman sent a copy of it to each of the major cities of Makka, Damascus, Kufa, Basra and Madina. The action of Uthman to burn the other copies besides the final recension, though obviously drastic, was for the betterment and harmony of the whole community and was unanimously approved by the Companions of the Prophet. Zaid ibn Thabit is reported to have said: "I saw the Companions of Muhammad (going about) saying, 'By God, Uthman has done well! By God, Uthman has done well!" Another esteemed Companion Musab ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas said: "I saw the people assemble in large number at Uthman's burning of the prescribed copies (of the Quran), and they were all pleased with his action; not a one spoke out against him". Ali ibn Abu Talib, the cousin of the Prophet and the fourth successor to the Prophet commented: "If I were in command in place of Uthman, I would have done the same".

    Of the copies made by Uthman, two still exist to our day. One is in the city of Tashkent (Uzbekistan) and the second one is in Istanbul (Turkey). Below is a brief account of both these copies:

    1. The copy which Uthman sent to Madina was reportedly removed by the Turkish authorities to Istanbul, from where it came to Berlin during World War I. The Treaty of Versailles, which concluded World War I, contains the following clause:
      • Article 246: Within six months from the coming into force of the present Treaty, Germany will restore to His Majesty, King of Hedjaz, the original Koran of Caliph Othman, which was removed from Madina by the Turkish authorities and is stated to have been presented to the ex-Emperor William II.
      • This manuscript then reached Istanbul, but not Madina (where it now resides).
      • The second copy in existence is kept in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. It may be the Imam (master) manuscript or one of the other copies made at the time of Uthman.
    2. It Came to Samarkand in 890 Hijra (1485) and remained there till 1868. Then it was taken to St. Petersburg by the Russians in 1869. It remained there till 1917. A Russian orientalist gave a detailed description of it, saying that many pages were damaged and some were missing. A facsimile, some 50 copies, of this mushaf (copy) was produced by S. Pisareff in 1905. A copy was sent to the Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid, to the Shah of Iran, to the Amir of Bukhara, to Afghanistan, to Fas and some important Muslim personalities. One copy is now in the Columbia University Library (U.S.A.). The Manuscript was afterwards returned to its former place and reached Tashkent in 1924, where it has remained since.

    Christianism - Judaism

    Excerpts from "Beginning with Torah Basics" - Wiley: The Torah, also known as the Five Books of Moses, is the most sacred object and the most important text of the Jewish people. As a sacred scroll found in every synagogue throughout the world, it’s referred to as a sefer Torah (say-fehr toe-rah; Torah scroll); as a bound book, it’s referred to as a chumash (khuh-mahsh; five). The Torah is more than a text, though; it’s also the spiritual tradition of the Jewish people, communicated by God (the Creator and Master of the universe) to Moses (the greatest prophet of the Jewish people) on Mount Sinai in 1280 BCE and handed down from generation to generation.

    On January 19, 1923, the Hasler Nachrichten reports: "Henry Ford is perhaps the biggest anti-semite of our time." The American automobile king was known in the twenties as the richest man in the world. The German Hitler movement grew and took strength from 1920 on under the direct, open and close participation of Ford. Only when Ford's public support was no longer necessary did he separate himself from anti-semitism. He continued to aid Hitler, however.

    The Volksrecht (People's Rights) reported on September 19, 1945: The Ford works are accused of furnishing supplies regularly to the Nazis. The correspondent from TASS Agency in New York reports: "Documents discovered in Germany, as well as thorough investigation have proven that the American Ford Co. produced war materials for the Nazis and assisted German armaments before and during the war up to 1944. Before Pearl Harbor, Henry Ford himself approved the contracts between his factories and the Hitler government. In 1939 a gift of 50,000 marks is said to have been turned over to Hitler from representatives of the Ford works."

    The strong financial connections between Sir Henry Deterding, head of the Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. and Hitler are well known and still fresh in the memory so that it is enough just to mention the name here. Konrad Heiden writes on this matter in his Hitler biography: "Direct and indirect financial connections to Henry Deterding. the great inspiration and donor to anti-bolshevist campaigns were not denied."

    In 1927 an attack appeared against the anti-semites by C.A. Loosli: "The Evil Jews!" The author polemicizes mainly against the two literary leaders of anti-semitism, Henry Ford and Rosenberg. He uses the expressions "Ford and his swastika- confederates" (p. 57), "the German anti-semites in alliance with Ford" (p. 60) , "Mr. Ford and Mr. Rosenberg" (p. 33).

    Hitler was made not only by German capital, but primarily by international and especially America capital that intervened decisively from the beginning, from ca. 1920, in the battle for power in Germany. If this German battle for power had been decided within the Weimar Republic by German means only, then Hitler would never have won. Hitler became the strongest man in Germany because he had access to the strongest international assistance. His strength and success can only be understood at all when this fact is taken into account.

    Christianity is the favoured faith in 28 of the 40 countries with a preferred religion. More than half of the total provide funds or resources for religious education programmes that largely benefit the preferred religion, and a third provide funding or resources for religious buildings. Christian churches receive preferential treatment in more countries – 28 – than any other unofficial but favored faith. pewforum.org/2017/10/03/ many-countries-favor-specific-religions-officially-or-unofficially.

    The word 'Easter' does not occur in Bible. It was a pagan festival named after Goddess Eostre. The festival and Goddess predates Christianity by thousands of years. Christian simply adopted it and thus Ester originially had nothing to do with Jesus!

    Russian law designates Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism as the country’s “traditional” religions, while also recognizing the “special contribution” of Russian Orthodox Christianity to Russian history.

    In addition to the 30 countries in this analysis, another 19 nations have religious requirements for ceremonial monarchs who serve as their heads of state. Sixteen of these, including the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, are members of the Commonwealth of Nations with Queen Elizabeth II – also known as the Defender of the Faith – as their head of state. The other countries in this category are Denmark, Norway and Sweden.

    • Bible was not written originally in English but Hebrew! God did not know that English will one day spread acoss the world like wildfire!
    • The 'original' New Testament was written in Greek! King James edition published in 1611.
    • The Holy Bible is the fin al product of over two millennia of scholars playing broken telephone.
    • There were no title on the transcripts of Gospels (John, Luke, Matthew, Mark) - none of them were written by disciples of Jesus! Gosples of Matthew was written in third person using 'they' and 'he' and never 'we' and 'me'.
    • The Church did not come from the Bible, the Bible came from the Church.
    • The Vaticanus and the Sainiticus were both very corrupted manuscripts when they were found--written over, crossed out, and one was found in the trash can. Yet Hort and Westcott from the 19th century used both to create a terrible manuscript that all modern versions are based upon.

    NT: starting lines - Christ is born of Mary, She conceives by the power of the Holy Ghost, Our Lord is named Jesus. 1.16: And Jacob begat a Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.

    Testimonies of supernatural events by people over 1000 years ago whether they refer to the Quran or the bible, are not credible accounts and are the weakest form of evidence. So we can safely say the Bible and the Quran are both wrong in that respect. And the Bible doesn't have 'multiple' witnesses. It has a claim by 1 person that there were multiple witnesses. That is quite an important distinction that many Christian don't seem to grasp.

    Genesis: 2.21-23: 21 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof. 22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. 23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. ||| However, there are two versions of the creation in Genesis. In one, Eve was created at the same time as Adam.

    Who told the serpent what the effects of eating the fruit would be? If God knows everything in advance then it knew that Adam and Eve was going to eat the fruit so why act all surprised for?


    News Channels in India

    NDTV India: Radhika Roy and Prannoy Roy holds around 29.18% stake and 14.17% is owned by Abhey Oswal through Oswal Greentech Limited who is father-in-law of Congress Ex-MP and industrialist Naveen Jindal. Radhika Roy is sister of Rajya Sabha MP Brinda Karat who is wife of CPI(M) General Secretary, Prakash Karat.

    THE TIMES GROUP: The company remains a family-owned business as the descendants of Sahu Jain own a majority stake in The Times Group.The Times of India. Times Now is part of the Times group which is a very big media house which operates Times of India, Mid-Day, Nav-Bharath Times, Stardust, Femina, Vijay Times, Vijaya Karnataka and Times Now. Times Group is owned by Bennet & Coleman. The Italian Robertio Mindo who has a share in the group is a close relative of Sonia Gandhi.

    News 24 - Anuradha Prasad: Anuradha Prasad managing director of BAG films and wife of Congress Rajya Sabha MP Rajeev Shukla. She is the sister of BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad who is present Union Minister of Communications and Information Technology.

    India News - Owned by Karthikeya Sharma, who owns the ITV Media group that operates many news channels including News X. Karthikeya Sharma and Manu Sharma (Convicted in Jessica Lal murder case) are sons of Congress leader Venod Sharma.


    Tarana-i-Milli (Song of the Religious Community) by Iqbal - तराना-ए-मिल्ली: इक़बाल

    Note how Iqbal refers to the Ka'bah as an 'idol-temple'.
    चीन-ओ-अरब हमारा हिन्दोस्ताँ हमारा, मुस्लिम हैं हम वतन है सारा जहाँ हमारा
    Central Asia and Arabia are ours, Hindustan is ours. We are Muslims, the whole world is our homeland.
    तौहीद की अमानत सीनों में है हमारे, आसाँ नहीं मिटाना नाम-ओ-निशाँ हमारा
    The trust of Oneness is in our breasts, it is not easy to erase our identity.
    दुनिया के बुत-कदों में पहला वो घर ख़ुदा का, हम इस के पासबाँ हैं वो पासबाँ हमारा
    Among the world's idol-temples the first is that house of the Lord, we are its door-guards, it is our door-guard.
    तेग़ों के साए में हम पल कर जवाँ हुए हैं, ख़ंजर हिलाल का है क़ौमी निशाँ हमारा
    We were raised and have become youths, in the shadow of swords, the scimitar of the crescent moon is our 'group-related' sign.
    मग़रिब की वादियों में गूँजी अज़ाँ हमारी, थमता न था किसी से सैल-ए-रवाँ हमारा
    In the valleys of the west our call to prayer echoed, our moving flood did not stop on account of anyone.
    बातिल से दबने वाले ऐ आसमाँ नहीं हम, सौ बार कर चुका है तू इम्तिहाँ हमारा
    We are not, oh sky, ones to be oppressed by falsehood, a hundred times you've already tested us.
    ऐ गुलिस्तान-ए-उंदुलुस वो दिन हैं याद तुझ को, था तेरी डालियों में जब आशियाँ हमारा
    Oh garden of Andalusia! you remember those days, when our nest was in your branches.
    ऐ मौज-ए-दजला तू भी पहचानती है हम को, अब तक है तेरा दरिया अफ़्साना-ख़्वाँ हमारा
    Oh wave of the Tigris! you too recognize us, till now your river is our story-teller.
    ऐ अर्ज़-ए-पाक तेरी हुर्मत पे कट मरे हम, है ख़ूँ तिरी रगों में अब तक रवाँ हमारा
    Oh pure land! for your sacredness we have been cut down and have died, till now our blood moves in your veins.
    सालार-ए-कारवाँ है मीर-ए-हिजाज़ अपना, इस नाम से है बाक़ी आराम-ए-जाँ हमारा
    Our leader of the caravan is the Chief of the Hijaz, through that name the peace of our spirit lives on.
    'इक़बाल' का तराना बाँग-ए-दरा है गोया, होता है जादा-पैमा फिर कारवाँ हमारा
    Iqbal's song is the call of a bell, again our caravan is on the road.

    Thiesm vs Athiesm
    Athiesm Thiesm
    It is my belief that there is not enough evidence to prove that God exists! Why should it offend to theist? The burden of proof lies equally on athiests!
    As I do not have the evidences, I cannot say that the god does not exist. I can still question the way the existence of god is presented! One cannot argue that absence of evidence is the evidence of absence (of God).
    Resonableness is demonstrated not asserted! God! Who else could it be?
    Only argument a religion person has is the faith! Can a book written by a mortal be used as evidence of the super-natural!
    The bible is not evidence, the bible is the claim. Evidence is needed that the claims made in the Bible are real, untill that time, I am not convinced by a book. There are too many instances of miracle and super-natural events.
    Argumentum ad populum is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition must be true because many or most people believe it, often concisely encapsulated as: "If many believe so, it is so."
    One thing often overlooked is that the Bible isn't alone in its claims. Other holy texts make similar claims of supernatural occurrences and in general, there are claims in the MILLIONS about supernatural things happening in the world.
    The bible is evidence that a book exists. I know that the book "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz" is 100% true because Dorothy was from Kansas and we know that Kansas exists.
    Why does a Christian expect a book written by unknown authors in a variety of languages, that was translated, rewritten, edited countless times is evidence for anything?
    Do all 4 gosples agree with each other? They are supposed to be ultiate truth. God loves us so much, he created hell, just in case we don't love him back. The Bible is not evidence of anything and has zero credibility.
    So if a slave can choose between serving and getting beaten to death, that means he's free! "It says in the Bible!" - the standard go-to clause. This is the power and incessant drip-feeding of indoctrinaion. It utterly destroys the ability to think logically and critically.
    Your failure to understand science does not prove the existence of god. Religious nutters don't seem to understand the difference between "X exists" and "I believe that X exists".
    God is omni-protent, omni-present and omi-scient! Can he create a rock which he cannot lift?
    The burden of proof is on the people making the outlandish claims. Atheists aren't claiming an invisible, jealous, genocidal, all powerful, all knowing being is constantly watching, picking who wins sporting events and awards, deciding who gets rich and making His naughty and nice lists. If one claimed, without any proof that someone else can actually see, he/she had an invisible friend compelling him/her to do "his/her works" up to and including killing anyone that questioned HIS existence he/she rightfully be in an asylum.....But all that's just Church on Sunday to the religious.
    • If God is omniscient (all-knowing) and hence would know what we want before we ask, isn't a prayer an insult to his powers?
    • Why all-knowing, all-powerful, omni-present God would need special places of worship or rituals?
    • If one prays and God grants his/her wishes, it proves God. If he/she prays and God does not grant his/her wish, it is God's wish (and does not dispprove God)! Only fools can buy this!
    • Anyone whose prayers work, would you please take time to pray for kids and females to stop being abused and flesh-traded? At least they shuld go to the casinos and earn large sum of money through prayers for people starving in the world!
    • If prayers worked, no man on the planet would be able to get his pants on!
    Contact us
    Disclaimers and Policies

    The content on CFDyna.com is being constantly refined and improvised with on-the-job experience, testing, and training. Examples might be simplified to improve insight into the physics and basic understanding. Linked pages, articles, references, and examples are constantly reviewed to reduce errors, but we cannot warrant full correctness of all content.